It’s a rare treat to be able to drive two vehicles of the same class for a classic head-to-head comparo. Thanks to the popularity of mid-sized SUVs, the Honda CR-V and the Mazda CX-5 both are leftfield choices for buyers who prefer comfort and refinement above all else. With both of these choices equipped with a diesel powertrain and all-wheel drive, can Honda, the childhood favorite successfully take on Mazda, one of the segment’s best? Read on.
Exterior
The CR-V’s design has evolved over the years, coming a long way from the boxy look of the first-generation. It’s become softer, rounder, and more refined over the decades. That said, its functional aesthetic borders on the fussy and lacks the minimalist modernity—often a barometer for premiumness that’s the fashion trend today.
With that, the Mazda wins this round. The long hood, clean lines, and sleek curvature make the CX-5 look more premium than its price suggests. The second-generation model, with that large wing grille and slim, sinewy headlines give it a fascia that’s classic yet sporty.
Winner: Mazda CX-5
Interior
The two stack up very close together on this one, but in the end, the Mazda CX-5 wins by a slight margin. Both being the top-of-the-line variants, there are no qualms with either when it comes to interior finishing. Both have ergonomically-sound and plush leather seats, and a pleasing instrument panel that’s easy to understand and use.
What made the CX-5 come out on top through is that the cabin definitely feels more premium. Like its exterior, Mazda has done their job in making the interior look and feel a class above. It’s made even more obvious when you start poking around like how the buttons feel crisper and the metallic accents feel much more convincing.
Winner: Mazda CX-5
Space and Practicality
This is where Honda wins by a landslide. If there’s one thing that Honda’s gotten right over the years, it’s that they are able to maximize vehicle space; the CR-V is no different. There’s wealth of space in every row, even down to the cargo hold. What’s even better is that the CR-V converts to a 7-seater for quick commutes, increasing its practicality over the 5-seater CX-5.
More than just its abundance of space, the CR-V also offers better overall visibility over the CX-5. While Mazda has opted to cocoon its drivers thanks to a high beltline, the CR-V has done the opposite. This makes it a much better choice for families who might have kids who’re claustrophobic.
Winner: Honda CR-V
Performance and Fuel Economy
With a sizeable engine advantage, the CX-5 once again trumps over the CR-V. Without a back-to-back drive, the CR-V’s 120-horsepower output may feel adequate, but once you get to try the 175-horsepower Skyactiv-D, the tables are turned.
There’s just an immediacy to the Mazda that the Honda can’t match. At every acceleration attempt, the CR-V will pause for a split-second before the power comes in, as if deciding whether or not to respond to the driver’s throttle input. On the other hand, the CX-5 comes with a continuous surge.
In addition, the CX-5 is definitely the quieter of the two. Both of these have that telltale diesel clatter, but on the Honda, it’s gruffer, sometimes even overpowering the radio in the process. By comparison, the Mazda remains hushed with just a lowkey rumble that’s largely unobtrusive.
In terms of ride and handling, the CR-V is definitely the cushier of the two with a softly sprung suspension. This results in great low-speed ride, but can feel somewhat detached at higher speed. On the other hand, the CX-5 may have a firmer suspension, but it’s neutral, responsive, and definitely more refined at any speed.
Winner: Mazda CX-5
Value for Money
With a price spread of just P 105,000 between them, the cheaper CR-V is the more bang-for-the-buck choice, especially if one were to judge it completely on the spec sheet. The ace up its sleeve is definitely Honda SENSING that integrates things like Forward Collision Mitigation and Adaptive Cruise Control—stuff you don’t get in the CX-5. Then there’s the larger two-panel moonroof and seven seats as well.
On the other hand, the CX-5 counters that, but mostly on the luxury front. It’s the one with a Bose sound system, powered front seats (the CR-V only has electric adjustment for the driver), and blind spot indicators (the CR-V does have Honda’s Lane Watch camera). And while these features are great for those seeking the finer things in life, for the regular Filipino buyer, these may see frivolous features.
Winner: Honda CR-V
Verdict
Choosing the outright winner here is incredibly tough. Both of these compact crossovers represent the best that the segment has to offer, but on two different fronts.
On one hand, there’s the Mazda CX-5 that offers a truly class-above look and feel with the driving dynamics to match. On the other, there’s the Honda CR-V which may not be as refined or plush, but scores high in terms of practicality.
After all’s said and done, while a true enthusiast will long for the CX-5, the typical Filipino buyer would appreciate the CR-V much more. The Honda doesn’t send hearts aflutter as much as the Mazda, but it ticks off what matters to the regular SUV buyer: safe and predictable handling, generous space, and bang-for-the-buck features. In this comparo, the mind rules in favor of the Honda CR-V.
Winner: Honda CR-V
Words and Photos by Gen Tiu
2019 Honda CR-V SX Diesel AWD vs 2019 Mazda CX-5 AWD Sport D | ||
| Ownership | 2019 Honda CR-V 1.6 SX Diesel AWD | 2019 Mazda CX-5 AWD Sport D |
| Year Introduced | 2017 | 2017 |
| Vehicle Classification | Compact Crossover | Compact Crossover |
| The Basics | ||
| Body Type | 5-door SUV | 5-door SUV |
| Seating | 5 | 5 |
| Engine / Drive | F/AWD | F/AWD |
| Under the Hood | ||
| Displacement (liters) | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Delivery | Common Rail Direct Injection | Common Rail Direct Injection |
| Layout / # of Cylinders | I4 | I4 |
| BHP @ rpm | 120 @ 4,000 | 175 @ 4,500 |
| Nm @ rpm | 300 @ 2,000 | 420 @ 2,000 |
| Fuel / Min. Octane | Diesel | Diesel |
| Transmission | 9 AT | 6 AT |
| Cruise Control | Yes, Adaptive w/ Low Speed Follow | Yes |
| Fuel Economy @ Ave. Speed | 11.26 km/L @ 13 km/h | 9.29 km/L @ 14 km/h |
| Dimensions and Weights | ||
| Length (mm) | 4,571 | 4,550 |
| Width (mm) | 1,855 | 1,840 |
| Height (mm) | 1,667 | 1,680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2,660 | 2,700 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1,732 | 1,668 |
| Suspension and Tires | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent, MacPherson Strut | Independent, MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Independent, Multi-Link | Independent, Multi-Link |
| Front Brakes | Vented Disc | Vented Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Tires | Michelin Primacy 3 ST 235/60 R 18 H (f & r) | Toyo Proxes R46 A 225/55 R 19 V (f & r) |
| Wheels | Alloy | Alloy |
| Safety Features | ||
| Airbags | 6 | 6 |
| Anti-Lock Brakes (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Traction / Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Front Seatbelt | 3-pt ELR with pre-tensioner x 2 | 3-pt ELR with pre-tensioner x 2 |
| Traction / Stability Control | 3-pt ELR x 3 (2nd row), 3-pt ELR x 2 (3rd row) | 3-pt ELR x 3 |
| ISOFIX Child Seat Anchor | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes, Front and Rear, w/ Camera | Yes, Front and Rear, w/ Camera |
| Other Safety Features | Hill Start Assist Lane Keep Assist Lane Departure Warning Road Departure Mitigation Front Collision Warning Collision Mitigation Braking Tire Pressure Monitoring System Driver Attention Monitor | Hill Hold Assist Blindspot Monitoring System Lane Departure Warning Lane Keep Assist |
| Exterior Features | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED, Active |
| Fog Lamps | Yes, Front (LED) | Yes, Front (LED) |
| Auto Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Rain-sensing Wipers | Yes | Yes |
| Interior Features | ||
| Steering Wheel Adjust | Tilt/Telescopic | Tilt/Telescopic |
| Steering Wheel Material | Leather | Leather |
| Seating Adjustment (driver) | 6-way Electric (driver) | 6-way Electric, w/ Memory |
| Seating Adjustment (front passenger) | Manual | 4-way Electric |
| Seating Surface | Leather | Leather |
| Folding Rear Seat | Yes, 60/40 (2nd row), 50/50 (3rd row) | Yes, 40/20/40 |
| On-Board Computer | Yes | Yes |
| Convenience Features | ||
| Power Steering | Yes | Yes |
| Power Door Locks | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Mirrors | Yes, with Fold | Yes, with Fold |
| Climate Control | Automatic, Dual (Front), Manual with Vents (Rear) | Automatic, Dual w/ Rear Vents |
| Proximity Key | Yes | Yes |
| Audio System | Stereo Aux USB HDMI Bluetooth GPS Apple CarPlay Android Auto | Stereo DVD MP3 USB Bluetooth GPS |
| # of Speakers | 8 | 10, Bose |
| Steering Controls | Yes | Yes |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to leave your comment or share your views. Comments that are derogatory and/or spam will not be tolerated. We reserve the right to moderate and/or remove these comments.